A high-ranking official at the Department of Justice has launched a formal review into the recent use of the presidential “autopen”—an automated signing device used for official documents—after concerns were raised about its role in issuing pardons.

Ed Martin, the DOJ’s incoming pardon attorney, confirmed that the review has been underway for several weeks. According to Martin, the investigation began while he was still serving as interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

The focus of the probe centers on whether the autopen was used appropriately in the final stretch of the last administration, particularly for signing off on presidential pardons. Martin noted that a whistleblower came forward with serious concerns about the process and how access to the president’s signature may have been managed.

“I had a whistleblower in my office 10 days ago,” Martin told journalist Mark Halperin. “They named three individuals who allegedly controlled access to the pardons process.”

While Martin did not confirm any wrongdoing, he emphasized the importance of getting clarity: “We have to get to the bottom of it—for the integrity of the process and for public trust.”

Several individuals named in connection with the process have reportedly retained legal representation. The whistleblower is said to have been closely involved in campaign operations during the 2020 election cycle.

Martin shared that more individuals were later added to the list of people potentially involved in managing document authorization, though no formal accusations have been made.

The use of the autopen in official settings isn’t new, but it can raise concerns if not properly overseen—especially when it involves critical documents like executive orders or pardons. These concerns have gained attention in recent months after reports surfaced that the president’s signature had appeared on documents during times he was reportedly away from Washington.

As part of the inquiry, investigators are reviewing timelines, communications, and protocols related to the pardons process to ensure everything followed legal and ethical standards.

The Department of Justice has not made further public statements but confirmed that the review is ongoing. No conclusions have been reached, and no individuals have been formally accused of misconduct.

This situation underscores the importance of transparency in how executive powers—especially those involving pardons—are exercised and documented. Martin affirmed that the goal is to ensure accountability while preserving the integrity of the nation’s highest office.